Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

For non-specific Magical discussion.

Re: Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

Postby BrAugustine on Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:12 am

btw not to suggest that you did something wicked -- i'm a guy too ;-)
BrAugustine
Candidate
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:44 am
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA

Re: Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

Postby non sum qualis eram on Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:42 am

Frater ANV wrote:Likewise NSQE, I don't believe that Will and desire are one an the same but that they can under certain circumstances behave in a similar fashion. Perhaps it has something to do with the psychology being easier to understand? I'll elabourate more; most of us have a thousand and one fantasies a day (they say more of a certain genre if you're a man! :lol: ) and in some ways we tend to access or allow ourselves to access the fantasy sooner than we would do the magical manifestation of something which a lot of people spend developing their understanding of the magic in motion.

Thank you Frater A.N.V.

I guess I was thinking of the Will as putting the magic in motion. In one of the flying rolls (or maybe it was somewhere else) I thought there was something about focusing your desire for a realized effect that sounded a lot like Will.
I see a difference, now, between a fantasy desire from the emotional 'desire' in magical working (Invocation, for example).
And then there is the difference in Will (as in to Dare, to Know, to Will, to be Silent) as the magical Will, and the Will as the True Will (in the Thelemic sense). or is there?...
non sum qualis eram
Candidate
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:14 pm

Re: Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

Postby non sum qualis eram on Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:47 am

BrAugustine wrote:
non sum qualis eram wrote:A little joke on the topic: "Desire" Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French desirer, from Latin desiderare, from de- + sider-, sidus heavenly body ;)


Ah, yes -- "sideral" means "of the stars" (used technically in astronomy). "De" implies descent -- as in "Rorate cœli desuper et nubes pluant justum" (Roman rite, Introit, 4th Sunday of Advent). "Descended from the starry realm" suggests projection of Woman (Hail Sophia!) onto woman. Projection (mathematically) implies loss of information: Woman contains woman in potential, among other things. Chivalry is the reverse projection process (woman onto Woman). The irony is that information loss happens in both directions (Charles Williams' "Letters to Lalage"): projecting a specific woman onto Woman hides her unique personality. This is the trouble with fantasy: the woman in question, projected onto an idea, becomes object and then (in the worst case) succubus -- empty and vampiric because the human personality is lost.

An enlightened take on Jungs' Anima/Animus? It all seems familiar to me in that sense.
non sum qualis eram
Candidate
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:14 pm

Re: Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

Postby BrAugustine on Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:00 am

non sum qualis eram wrote:
BrAugustine wrote:
non sum qualis eram wrote:A little joke on the topic: "Desire" Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French desirer, from Latin desiderare, from de- + sider-, sidus heavenly body ;)


Ah, yes -- "sideral" means "of the stars" (used technically in astronomy). "De" implies descent -- as in "Rorate cœli desuper et nubes pluant justum" (Roman rite, Introit, 4th Sunday of Advent). "Descended from the starry realm" suggests projection of Woman (Hail Sophia!) onto woman. Projection (mathematically) implies loss of information: Woman contains woman in potential, among other things. Chivalry is the reverse projection process (woman onto Woman). The irony is that information loss happens in both directions (Charles Williams' "Letters to Lalage"): projecting a specific woman onto Woman hides her unique personality. This is the trouble with fantasy: the woman in question, projected onto an idea, becomes object and then (in the worst case) succubus -- empty and vampiric because the human personality is lost.

An enlightened take on Jungs' Anima/Animus? It all seems familiar to me in that sense.


*nods* i understand the Anima as referring to two separate but related ideas:

1. The feminine personality in the man (see William Gray's discussion of Hod in "Ladder of Lights")
2. The man's internal image or concept of woman

The above discussion relates to #2. When i get some time, i'd like to post a diagram i've been working on, that shows Jung's Anima figures (Eve, Helen, Mary, and Sophia) as labels for arrows on a process diagram between "Woman" (abstract and impersonal) and "woman" (concrete and personal).
BrAugustine
Candidate
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:44 am
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA

Re: Thoughts seem to affect things unintintionally?

Postby non sum qualis eram on Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:17 am

Thank you frater. I look forward to seeing your diagram. :)

ETA: Sorry about going off-topic Ace of Spades. :oops:
The diagram and Anima discussion continues here: http://www.goldendawnforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1358.
non sum qualis eram
Candidate
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:14 pm

Previous

Return to General Magical Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron